[ SECRET POST #2739 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2739 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[abharding]

After I saw the second movie, a friend of mine asked me what I thought of it...and I said it was a bad mix of II and XI. I wouldn't say it took the worst parts of those two movies as both were pretty good films, but they just didn't work here because there wasn't the back story to support them. In the original films we knew why Khan hated Kirk, we knew why Kirk hated the Klingons - In Into Darkness there was none of that.

[cushlamochree]

Exactly.

In the end Into Darkness actually kind of relies on people already knowing about the Klingons and Khan. They never take the time to set it up in the movie, so the main reason that you care about Khan is because you know what happened in Wrath of Khan originally. Which is a really fan-wanky thing to do when you're trying to reboot a series from scratch.