case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-03 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2739 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2739 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: STID is better than the 2009 film...

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
2009 also has tons of plot holes though…like the fact that old Spock stays on Delta Vega because it's more important for Kirk and Spock to be best friends than save the Earth.

Yeah, STID makes no sense, but I'd argue the 2009 film doesn't make much more.

But I've given up completely on the plots. The reason I prefer STID has to do with the fact that the characters are a lot more likable. They're not always tearing each other down and they actually cooperate and seem to care about one another. So it's more enjoyable for me on that level.

Re: STID is better than the 2009 film...

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
SA

"STID makes no sense, but I'd argue the 2009 film doesn't make much more."

I'm sorry, this *is* what I meant. I didn't say it very well. STID makes zero sense, 2009 makes !% sense.

I couldn't even focus on the characters, I was too baffled by the plot.

Re: STID is better than the 2009 film...

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
I guess what I'm saying is that given that I gave up on both plots completely, I look to the characters and that pushes STID over for 2009 for me.

Both the plots are basically dead. STID's has been gruesomely dismembered and is a basically a pile of entrails while 2009 Trek's is mostly still intact, but they're equally "dead" to me.

But I can see why you'd be too baffled by the plot to focus on the characters…

I just tried to look on the bright side. And I don't consider the 2009 film's plot to be a bright side.