case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-03 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2739 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2739 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 021 secrets from Secret Submission Post #391.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: STID is better than the 2009 film...

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
SA

"STID makes no sense, but I'd argue the 2009 film doesn't make much more."

I'm sorry, this *is* what I meant. I didn't say it very well. STID makes zero sense, 2009 makes !% sense.

I couldn't even focus on the characters, I was too baffled by the plot.

Re: STID is better than the 2009 film...

(Anonymous) 2014-07-04 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
I guess what I'm saying is that given that I gave up on both plots completely, I look to the characters and that pushes STID over for 2009 for me.

Both the plots are basically dead. STID's has been gruesomely dismembered and is a basically a pile of entrails while 2009 Trek's is mostly still intact, but they're equally "dead" to me.

But I can see why you'd be too baffled by the plot to focus on the characters…

I just tried to look on the bright side. And I don't consider the 2009 film's plot to be a bright side.