[ SECRET POST #2741 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2741 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 112 secrets from Secret Submission Post #392.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, they wanted his looks to appeal to female readers, apparently. As if women wouldn't have read the excellent stories otherwise! *eyeroll*

I think he'd have been just as popular among women if he were drawn "ugly" like Doyle wanted. Though, honestly, there's enough in the stories themselves that shows he wasn't plain in the least, but had a "striking" appearance. If he were a plain sort of fellow, Doyle would have said so, he was very particular about looks in his stories. "Plain in a vulgar sort of way", haha (was just reading a Case of Identity and Miss Sutherland is described by Watson as a fine woman in a vulgar sort of way, she wasn't high-born or super rich, hence the "vulgar" bit).

[tweedisgood]

In Watson's defence, he describes the just as modestly born and much more impoverished - Mary Morstan in glowing terms, and the same (allowing for not fancying them) of several of the governesses/typists [women who needed to work, pretty much bottom of the Victorian pile] they helped. I'd say it was more Mary Sutherland's denseness seen in retrospect than her class that provoked that comment.

My own vision of Holmes is indeed striking more than handsome - you only have to read his introduction in STUD to know that ACD meant him to be memorable.

[tweedisgood]

And what about: "For all the preposterous hat and the vacuous face, there was something noble in the simple faith of our visitor which compelled our respect"? ACD's characterisation can be quite subtle.