Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-08 07:08 pm
[ SECRET POST #2744 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2744 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 059 secrets from Secret Submission Post #392.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-08 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-08 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)...this isn't fandom specific, though...?
Re: ...this isn't fandom specific, though...?
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 02:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-08 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I agree though. To quote SFDebris, "You don't get credit for stuff you don't put in the movie because, now try to follow this because it's a pretty big leap, you didn't put it in the movie. I shouldn't have to wait months and watch all your deleted scenes to say 'Oh, this finally makes sense!' or pore through some non-canon books to say 'Oh, so this isn't a pile of nonsensical horseshit after all!'"
If you do an adaptation, its success or failure in the new medium depends solely on how well it uses that new medium to tell the story. The books don't matter.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandThey're probably missing the point of "tie-ins".
Re: They're probably missing the point of "tie-ins".
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 00:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: They're probably missing the point of "tie-ins".
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-08 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 00:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-08 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-09 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-09 12:12 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 06:26 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-09 12:37 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-09 12:44 am (UTC)(link)That said, I always like it when seeing the movie makes me actually want to read the book. Not because it was confusing or missing something, but it was so good I want to enhance the experience and learn more.
no subject
I *get* why fans of the source material do what they do, though. It's really hard for me to watch adaptations with someone because I constantly want to point out what the adaption has changed from the source material, especially the parts that don't make sense to the other person. It gets frustrating if you know that the book/whatever explained something and the explanation got cut from the adaption. But the thing is that I don't think that works as an argument. If something gets adapted into a movie, chances are that it's the only version a good portion of the audience will experience. Which means that the film should be able to explain stuff like backstories and character motives to that audience. The source material shouldn't be used as an shield to excuse the adaption's faults.
Also, the whole "oh, you just don't like it because you didn't get it~" argument? I hate that. Nope. People can totally get the point a movie was trying to make and still dislike it.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-07-09 10:13 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject