[ SECRET POST #2748 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2748 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Early because ... World Cup! No other excuse.

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 087 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[esteefee]

I would think, though, that there must be some way to detect telepathic waves scientifically. People could start to buy telepathy detectors, or I'm sure there's an app for that already. ;)

The thing is, there are extraordinarily sensitive sound detection devices in existence today and in use. There are cameras everywhere. Our privacy is a thing of the past. Yet people do not act as if they don't have privacy. You can't detect if a boom mic is trained on you (not you, cushlamochree, but generalized you), or if someone is using a line tap.

I think there would be the usual hue and cry over telepaths that there is in the U.S. about the CIA, but hey, privacy? What privacy? And how many telepaths are there floating around, really, versus real surveillance?

And why do you think a telepath would be interested in *your* thoughts, exactly? Again, not you, cushlamochree, but thanks for getting me thinky.