Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-12 03:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #2748 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2748 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Early because ... World Cup! No other excuse.
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 087 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: tw for animal cruelty?
But no and no. It's an interesting thought experiment though. Morally I just don't see a compelling argument meat eating to be okay but not zoophilia. Or rather in the first world. You do not need to hunt to survive, and the idea that we allow more animals to live that wouldn't in the wild doesn't even slightly hold up if you follow through with it.
Re: tw for animal cruelty?
(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 12:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: tw for animal cruelty?
Re: tw for animal cruelty?
(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: tw for animal cruelty?
Re: tw for animal cruelty?
(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 12:58 am (UTC)(link)or is eating meat morally equivalent to having sex with animals, but poisoning them is worse?
Re: tw for animal cruelty?
(Anonymous) 2014-07-13 12:56 am (UTC)(link)