[ SECRET POST #2750 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2750 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________


















02. [WARNING for animal death]




__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Secret 2 related

[darkmanifest]

Testing requires a lot of controls. Condemned criminals who've been on death row long enough for all their appeals to have run out are too few and too much the same (overwhelmingly male, white, and middle aged) to be of much use for testing. For scientists to get the variety they need for useful results, we'd have to increase how easy it is to get condemned and restrict the appeals process, which would lead to much more innocent test subjects, and kind of defeats the point of the "deserving" getting tested on that lurks behind this question, as if testing is a punishment instead of a necessity.