Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-07-14 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2750 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2750 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02. [WARNING for animal death]

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #393.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-07-15 09:05 am (UTC)(link)I think back many years ago, it was much more taboo for gay men to raise families. That breeder name-calling was a semi-humorous way of dissipating that sadness. I understand it, but it was misguided.
Like many women, I can't have kids. Never wanted them, anyway.
I'm glad that breeder remark is less common now. It reflected most badly on the gay community, implying gay people couldn't be capable parents.
I've never seen a SJW use the term. Some child-free groups do use the term (as well as the delightful "crotch-fruit") but they're just being juvenile (ironically).