fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2756 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2756 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 - broken links ], [ 1 2 3 - not!secrets (random images from what appears to be one spammy anon) ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I thought OP was saying that non-creators ripping off the original content and non-creators ripping off fanart are pretty much the same thing, but people make ripping off fanart to be more of a crime. Is that not what is being said?

I don't think that's what they mean because I've never seen anyone refer to fanart as the fanartist's IP. IP refers to the characters and settings the fanartist is borrowing. Are you in a fandom where bootlegs aren't considered morally sketchy?

I've never bought or created merch so I wouldn't know.

But thanks for clarifying.

[ SECRET POST #2756 ]

Wait, I'm confused.

Re: Wait, I'm confused.

Re: Wait, I'm confused.