case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-07-23 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2759 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2759 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-07-24 05:40 am (UTC)(link)
They have different abilities but so what, are we assuming the only thing stopping people from committing horrific crimes is their lack of capability?

In the case of mutants, yes, that's actually a pretty reasonable assumption. Not because they're inherently more prone to deliberate violence than the average person, but because in the world-setting in question, the majority of destructive powers are inherently difficult to control. Most mutants with destructive mutations will, at least once, lose control of that mutation, with frequently devastating consequences, because it's a biological process that is at best linked to a stress response, and at worst something approaching autonomic. They may not intend to, but that doesn't unhurt or unkill anyone they've hurt or killed because they don't know what they're doing, or how to not do it.
littlestbirds: (Default)

[personal profile] littlestbirds 2014-07-24 08:02 am (UTC)(link)
Well yes, that is a problem. A real one, if not very plausible and emphasized for dramatic effect, but I still don't see how a mandatory registry would help. You either trust parents/people, or you don't. The neglect and irresponsibilty that might cause people to lose control and not take precautions are already bad things, things that already cause violnce and social problems and end in government involvement anyway. I acknowledge there would need to be resources, new foster programs, different schools. How does a mandatory registry tracking everyone help anything but the atmosphere of oppressive dystopia. The movie moment problem of "anyone could have a Carrie moment and realize their mutant ability in a rain of adolescent blood" has no solution. I am really tired I hope this makes sense.