[ SECRET POST #2767 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2767 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04. [broken]


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Work. Again. Sorry if response time is slow. :(

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 011 secrets from Secret Submission Post #394.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big (also random unsubstantiated claims about famous people) ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[fingalsanteater]

Being a republican.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[sarillia]

This too. I can't see things as "just politics".

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[(Anonymous)]

Same. I suppose I should technically say "right-winger" as I did used to date a lady who was registered with the GOP, but she was just about as liberal as me on most issues.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I don't think I could date someone who is on the Republican side.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[(Anonymous)]

I think if the chemistry was there I'd hatesex one, though.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[fingalsanteater]

Lmao. I feel you on that.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[sarillia]

I did that, sort of. We were actually really compatible sexually but that was all we could do together.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[(Anonymous)]

Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. Even if someone was a moderate Republican and didn't necessarily agree with their party's stance... eh, just no. Claiming membership in a group that does horrible things that affects my everyday life doesn't computer for me. Maybe the exception is if the person were actively trying to fight against those objectionable things.

+1

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think this is that shallow, tbh. If you're at each other's throats over any political discussion to the point where no one can even mention politics, then it's not worth it.

Re: Shallow dealbreakers.

[elaminator]

Yup, agreed.