[ SECRET POST #2769 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2769 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

[(Anonymous)]

da

The comics ran years ago and were really terrible. This movie is basically "let's try that again."

Yeah, I was really surprised when it was announced that Marvel was going to adapt Guardians of the Galaxy of all things considering that the comics where wholly unremarkable and had little name recognition even among people who enjoy Marvel titles, much less the general population. It seemed like a recipe for disaster...but the movie still turned out to be awesome. I'm impressed, Marvel!

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

[(Anonymous)]

...huh. That is a weird take, from my perspective. I remember the (recent) comic as a beloved fan favorite, BECAUSE it had the same tone that the movie captures nicely.

I suspect some folks might be conflating it with the 1980s-90s Guardians of the Galaxy, which indeed mostly just sucked.

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy

[(Anonymous)]

Yep. Uninformed people who don't know what they are talking about, saying things that are totally misleading to innocent bystanders... Typical.