Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-08-02 03:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #2769 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2769 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
I'm mostly into it for Rocky -- he's originally a Keith Giffen character and that's pretty much an easy way to catch my interest.
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
Captain America aside, that seems to be Marvel's theme this year with this + BH6.
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 08:29 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 09:01 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)The comics ran years ago and were really terrible. This movie is basically "let's try that again."
Yeah, I was really surprised when it was announced that Marvel was going to adapt Guardians of the Galaxy of all things considering that the comics where wholly unremarkable and had little name recognition even among people who enjoy Marvel titles, much less the general population. It seemed like a recipe for disaster...but the movie still turned out to be awesome. I'm impressed, Marvel!
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)I suspect some folks might be conflating it with the 1980s-90s Guardians of the Galaxy, which indeed mostly just sucked.
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-04 01:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-04 12:51 am (UTC)(link):D
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy
(Anonymous) 2014-08-04 01:02 am (UTC)(link)The popularity of the Guardians of the Galaxy title dates back to the Abnett & Lanning version, circa 2008. They wrote several Marvel books around that time, commonly referred to as the Realm of Kings and Annihilation War or the Marvel Cosmic universe since there were crossovers all over the place and it involved space-based comics: it was more like a giant, sprawling braided novel and individual comics and it took place chronologically speaking about the same time as the Civil War. It is more or less universally agreed to be the very best type of pulp comics ever published by Marvel. As opposed to the graphic novel type comics like V for Vendetta or Watchmen (neither of which was published by Marvel, BTW).
Instead of misleading innocent people who don't know the comics, go and find the whole story arc, read, then come back to thank us: I'll be right here, waiting.
Re: Guardians of the Galaxy