case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-02 03:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2769 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2769 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-02 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay, I have this thought every time I read a thread about trans headcanons. I spend a lot of time on the "SJW" heavy parts of tumblr. I look at tags. I read posts by people I would never follow because they'd drive me crazy. But I almost never see this phenomenon FS claims happens all the time: "This 'female' character likes some 'boy' things, so 'she' MUST really be a boy!" Really, I don't see it. The things people say go more like "What if trans [character]?" or "Trans [character] is so important." The only cases of frequent insistent trans headcanons are for characters who crossdress in canon. I'm aware that doesn't mean "must be trans," either, but all I'm saying is simply having some stereotypical traits of the opposite gender is not at all, as far as I know, a common basis for insisting that someone MUST be trans.