[ SECRET POST #2770 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2770 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #396.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[philstar22]

Well, it depends. I wouldn't use the word "underage," but I do get creeped out by someone under 20 or so paired with someone considerably older. There are almost always power abuse issues involved or at least implicated, there is a wide difference in life experience, and it creeps me out. Someone under 20 still feels young enough that it almost always feels like the older person is taking advantage at least a little.

[(Anonymous)]

But that would also apply to someone whose 18 or 19, and yet they'd not be considered "underage".

It's not the dynamic that confuse me, just the labeling as "underage".

[philstar22]

Oh, yes, then I agree. That is not the appropriate label.

[(Anonymous)]

A big enough age gap creeps me out more now than it used to. I've seen a couple good friends get seriously used and shafted in relationships like that over the years. I've grown wary.