case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-09 03:52 pm

[ SECRET POST #2776 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2776 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 085 secrets from Secret Submission Post #397.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
Wait, so someone's an asshole for judging her for judging someone who hasn't actively wronged her, but she gets a free pass?

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
I'm guessing this was a shit-stirring secret by a proto-MRA type, and when he failed to get the response he was hoping for, he tried posting that response himself in the hope that a bunch of people would then agree.

Sad, isn't it?

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
Why does every secret that goes against the third-wave diktat get labeled as "proto-MRA"?
Are you really blind to the fact that women like that exist?

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 03:36 pm (UTC)(link)
No, but you're blind to the fact that you have so many verbal tells that it's like you're working from a style guide.

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Take a look at the outside world for once.

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Seriously, we don't even need IP logging; you're that obvious. I'm sorry that when you were a child someone told you you were smart. You clearly took it to heart, and you didn't realize they were lying. You're not smart and you never will be. That's got to be rough for you.

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
A bunch of baseless insults, now that's a flawless argument.

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
You don't deserve a serious argument. Being a large, slow-moving target for insults is literally the most value you can bring to this conversation. Why not embrace your role?

Re: You can do better, OP

(Anonymous) 2014-08-10 07:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Still burying your head in the sand I see.