ext_33427 (
degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-12-07 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #336 ]
⌈ Secret Post #336 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.
__________________________________________________
2.

__________________________________________________
3.

__________________________________________________
4.

__________________________________________________
5. [ not fandom ]
__________________________________________________
6.

__________________________________________________
7.

__________________________________________________
8.

__________________________________________________
9.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16. [ repeat ]
__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32. [ not!secret ]
__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
39.

__________________________________________________
40.

__________________________________________________
41.

__________________________________________________
42.

__________________________________________________
43.

__________________________________________________
44.

__________________________________________________
45.

__________________________________________________
46.

__________________________________________________
47.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Out again, Christmas shopping/making a buttload of cookies! You know what to do!
Last day to submit for next week!
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #048.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secret, [ 1 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Saturday, December 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

37 - I will limit myself to this.
Just about every Staff Chick in every RPG ever has this kind of personality at least in part; the Final Fantasy series has plenty of good examples, though Aerith of FFVII is arguably a subversion (she's not exactly docile and submissive, but she's otherwise more traditionally feminine than the other girls and DOES occupy the 'comforting, mothering figure' aspect - and comments on it in Advent Children). The best examples from the series would probably be devoted love interest Rosa from FFIV, Garnet/Dagger (when she's being a demure little princess and not a rebellious one) from FFIX and especially Yuna ...in FFX, though definitely not in X-2.
So. Aerith can be considered a subversion, Garnet and Yuna don't fit the mold all the time, and Rinoa isn't even mentioned. Way to go with your picture selections.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 02:09 am (UTC)(link)ALL THE CHARACTERS TO NOT FIT THE NADESHIKO TYPE TO A T. They are similar characters that all conform to an RPG CLICHE that is ROOTED in the type.
And if anyone says that these characters aren't similar in any way beyond being healer love-interests I'm going to be really, really annoyed.
You want to know an argument that I'm sick of hearing? 'Healer Girl X is shows that a woman can be traditionally feminine and still kick butt too!' Yes, there is nothing wrong with being traditionally feminine, and a traditionally feminine woman can be strong too. But you know what? I'M SICK OF IT. These women become boring after the 46579863th time.
I don't have anything against any of these characters INDIVIDUALLY. I'm saying they're a type, and a type that I'm really sick of seeing.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 02:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
This you could have (and probably should have) included in your secret. Ambiguity isn't the best route to take when writing these up.
Not knocking you for it, just saying, for future reference, etc.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
(Anonymous) 2007-12-08 03:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.
*cough* The issue is that you described them as Nadeshiko, and the major defining point of Nadeshiko -is- their passiveness. None of the characters you used are passive. Of cours people are going to disagree with you.
Re: 37 - I will limit myself to this.