case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-12 07:01 pm

[ SECRET POST #2779 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2779 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #397.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: spoilers? ish

[personal profile] mekkio 2014-08-13 12:23 am (UTC)(link)
Not to mention it can be pretty violent. Not in the Hannibal way but that one scene with Youndu where we finally see his whistle arrow in action left me going, "Whoa." That wasn't exactly a kid friendly scene.

Re: spoilers? ish

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2014-08-13 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
And yet I'd argue that it definitely was acceptable for kids, given how the scenes actually looked on screen.

There was no blood, there was no gore, there were no drawn out deaths (aside from the possible exception of the villain being disintegrated at the end, and Groot beating the guys against the walls). There was nothing that was terribly horrific or realistic about any of the violence.
mekkio: (Default)

Re: spoilers? ish

[personal profile] mekkio 2014-08-13 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
With that sort of thinking then Psycho should be re-labeled as a kid's film because the violence was filmed the same way and there were no sex scenes and the language was mild.

Re: spoilers? ish

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2014-08-13 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
I watched Psycho when I was ...9 or 10. Today's standards are absolutely different than yesterday's.

My point is, the reason I wouldn't call Psycho a kid's film and I would call GotG a kid's film is the tone of the film, not the content.

Re: spoilers? ish

(Anonymous) 2014-08-13 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
'Cept content matters, dumbfuck.

Re: spoilers? ish

[personal profile] herpymcderp 2014-08-13 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
On a scale of 1 to anal fissure, how much does your ass hurt?