Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-08-13 06:38 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-08-13 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2780 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2780 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
12.
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #397.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Re: +1
That sort of logic sounds exactly like contemporary American/Anglo Christian logic, so I responded with the relevant cultural more/context.
Though quite frankly, it still applies to just about any branch of Christianity, or hell any religion with a heavy basis in a singular religious text. The religion will be as much about the culture as the actual religious document by virtue of the fact such religious documents are so long and comprehensive, they eventually contradict themselves, anyway. Eventually, a culture or religious sect has to 'pick' one interpretation, which means ignoring the other ones - and with them, actual things said in the document. Bible, Qur'an, Mahabharata, etc., it happens over and over again around the world and throughout history.
So yes, my response is Americocentric given that an Anglo-American religious culture is being implied by the secret. But I don't see how that would actually make it inaccurate in the context of describing religious cultures in general, seeing as most of what I said is hardly an American-only phenomenon.