case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-16 03:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2783 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2783 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random pattern image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-16 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
But Valmont is the bad guy. It was bad that the bad guy was (allegedly) doing a bad thing? I hope someone finds this dissertation because this sound amazing.

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2014-08-17 01:46 am (UTC)(link)
I'm confused too .

It actually reminds me of people who try to get books banned and their reasons. (something I did a paper on in college) Like those people who tried to ban The Giver because it MENTIONED euthanasia regardless of the context it was mentioned. Or books about addiction being banned.

"it's about drugs, it'll make our kids take drugs!1" "it's about the dangers of addiction though....you'd have to be stupid to read a book about how awful drug addiction is, and then go 'I'mma go take some drugs now'" "BAN IT"

SJWs you're acting like Moral Guardians....time to take a break.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
LOL those people. Same people who tried to ban "To Kill a Mockingbird" because it had the word "nigger" in it a bunch of times, I'd bet. No matter that the word was used by racist characters as a characteristic of their shittiness and ignorance or outright villainy.

[personal profile] jaybie_jarrett 2014-08-17 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
Yup. Pretty much.

Mind numbingly idiotic

(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
They tried this with the Tom Sawyer and Huckleberry Finn books, too (censoring the "nigger" mentions). Like, hey, sure, erase all evidence that your own country was filled with racist assholes once, that'll teach'em not to use those evil words again!

... Wait.