case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-16 03:51 pm

[ SECRET POST #2783 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2783 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random pattern image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: terry pratchett misogyny

(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
There's nothing wrong with any of that. I'm sorry, but there's not. None of those are bad things in and of themselves.

He's enamored of attractive women and not afraid to say so - what horror!

Re: terry pratchett misogyny

(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
quick question before I respond: Are you male?

Re: terry pratchett misogyny

(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Da

I think you're missing the point of anon. And anyway I'm a girl and agree with the anon you replied to. It really bugs me when people use inate characteristics to judge how logically sound argument is because chances are someone from the opressed group agrees with them, logical arguments only pls.

Re: terry pratchett misogyny

(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I am. And I'm open to the possibility that there's some way in which this is different for different genders, I'm just damned if I can see it.

We're talking, specifically, about finding people attractive. Not writing people as nothing more than attractive - I don't think Pratchett does that, and in any case, it's not what the original anon was talking about. Not focusing on peoples' physical qualities to the exclusion of anything else. Just, simply, the fact of finding someone of the opposite sex attractive. I'm at a loss to see how that's problematic. For either gender. People find some other people attractive and like the way they look, and I think that's okay.