Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-08-16 03:51 pm
[ SECRET POST #2783 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2783 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random pattern image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: terry pratchett misogyny
(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)Re: terry pratchett misogyny
(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 02:49 pm (UTC)(link)I think you're missing the point of anon. And anyway I'm a girl and agree with the anon you replied to. It really bugs me when people use inate characteristics to judge how logically sound argument is because chances are someone from the opressed group agrees with them, logical arguments only pls.
Re: terry pratchett misogyny
(Anonymous) 2014-08-17 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)We're talking, specifically, about finding people attractive. Not writing people as nothing more than attractive - I don't think Pratchett does that, and in any case, it's not what the original anon was talking about. Not focusing on peoples' physical qualities to the exclusion of anything else. Just, simply, the fact of finding someone of the opposite sex attractive. I'm at a loss to see how that's problematic. For either gender. People find some other people attractive and like the way they look, and I think that's okay.