[ SECRET POST #2787 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2787 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

Official advertise your fandom-related thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[dancing_clown]

In addition to the master index I've got going on, I've been thinking for a while about periodically bringing a few old secrets back to the limelight. But given the wank about wank threads last night, I thought I'd go ahead and put it down below the games thread and announce it up here.

So scroll on down for a tiny look into the 2007 vault.

Edit: I've got no set schedule for this. They'll just be here when they're here. Thoughts on how many you' like in a post? I went with three. I probably wouldn't want to go more than five, so as not to compete too much with the main post.

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I really like this idea! Though if it's alright wth case, I'd like if it was put under general comments. How are you choosing secrets? Any criteria or is it just random? And three sounds good to me.

Thank you for this! I can see the old secrets and comment on them.

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[dancing_clown]

I'm mostly picking at random. The way the index works, is you find your fandom, and it directs you to posts that include that fandom. So, maybe I was thinking a batman secret might be nice, but while I was looking through one of those posts, I noticed a different secret that I liked.

And right now I'm mostly sticking to fandoms that appeal to me (though, QaF this week just jumped out of the blue; I never watched that show). As I do more, I'll probably make more of a conscious effort to toss in some of the anime stuff I don't really know anything about or some of the general, nonfandom specific secrets.

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[(Anonymous)]

Thank you for answering. I thought it might be a random sort of thing.

I'm a bit more interested in the anime secrets so I can't wait until they show up. Especially ones for my fandoms. Would you be willing to take requests for fandoms?

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[dancing_clown]

I have open ears, but I make no promises.

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[diet_poison]

This is so cool! I love that you're still doing this and I love that you're showcasing old secrets!

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[(Anonymous)]

OMG I'd forgotten the days of having to search for comments about the secrets you were interested in!! But thanks, this is interesting. :)

Re: Your Fandom Secrets: Back Again!

[(Anonymous)]

This actually is a better idea than the other one, you know. Resurrecting the secrets is a much more entertaining and positive than resurrecting the wank, IMO. Er. Unless the old secrets bring back the old wank...but surely picking and choosing carefully should eliminate that.