case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-08-22 07:53 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2789 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2789 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Captain America]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Thrilling Adventure Hour, Beyond Belief]


__________________________________________________



05. [SPOILERS for Walking Dead]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Fangirl]



__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Orange is the New Black]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for TWDG]



__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for suicide]



__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for abuse, (possibly?) rape]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #398.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - stock photo ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
Things that can and will eat me pose a threat. Straight jackets can be removed.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
Would you kill a tiger at a zoo?
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
If it was in a situation where it could eat me? Yes. And I would wear it's fur as a warning to other tigers about what happens to creatures that cross me.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 02:40 am (UTC)(link)
If it's locked up, how would it eat you?
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
If it's locked up then I'll trust a lock more than I'll trust a straight jacket. If it's locked up then it gets to live.

If it's out of it's cage then one of us is going down. I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to get eaten by a tiger. Or a zombie.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
So you think a little girl could easily escape from something most grown men couldn't?
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Nope. But someone could release her. And sic her on me because I am their enemy.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Except the Governor put his gun down and surrendered.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 03:17 am (UTC)(link)
As I recall, he was a slimy bastard who was willing to lie to everyone. I wouldn't trust him.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 03:50 am (UTC)(link)
It's not even a matter of trust at this point. Michonne had the upper hand. The gun was down. If he had attempted to sic Penny on her, it would take two seconds for her to dispatch what was one individual little girl. Michonne's actions had nothing to do with survival.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
I support eliminating threats before it becomes a matter of survival.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
Except it wasn't a threat. Even if it were to escape, it wouldn't be a threat to her.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-08-23 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure that all zombies are threats.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
DA

But the Governor's feelings!!! They are so much more important than the threat that zombie!Penny might cause! Even though zombies in the tv show haven't shown any signs of sapience! She wouldn't hurt anybody! /s

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
She couldn't hurt anybody as she was restrained and kept away.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 05:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 04:19 am (UTC)(link)
She was still a damn zombie and since the zombies in the tv show haven't shown any inkling of sapience, she still could have been a threat to someone down the line and thus I can't bring myself to care all that much that she died. She wasn't the same Penny that The Governor knew and there is no hope for a cure.

(Anonymous) 2014-08-23 06:42 am (UTC)(link)
Let's go over the many reasons why this is a really bad analogy:

1. Tigers are living beings that naturally inhabit our ecosystem. They are often endangered, and killing them harms the survivability of the species. We should be concerned about that.
2. Tigers as a species are not overall too dangerous to most humans. They are not a natural threat. Zombies are an unnatural threat, and each one is incredibly dangerous to not just one humans, but every human beyond that via infection.
3. Our current civilization is a place where even when tigers are kept locked up--i.e. zoos--you can trust on the infrastructure of society at large to keep you safe. Tigers are not an inherent threat. Not so with zombies, where your safety has no stability. A tiger locked up in a zoo in this scenario I can easily see being killed for survival purposes.
4. In a similar scenario of a maneating tiger that's ravenous to eat anyone it sees locked up by a maniac who is under their control, and the maniac is at your mercy, what do you choose to do with the tiger? Leave it? For what purpose? It can never be let go, and there's no reason to keep it alive. Do you let it starve? Is this more merciful?
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only