[ SECRET POST #2790 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2790 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: ALL heroines are "Sues"

[meishuu]

But heroes (and heroines) can be well written characters without being "good at everything" or even the "best at what they do". They can struggle with their flaws and shortcomings, and still be "heroes". Yes, they have to be in the lead, because that's what being a protagonist is about; the story is about them, and that doesn't make them Stus or Sues.

Re: ALL heroines are "Sues"

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT - I probably phrased this poorly. Yes, there absolutely CAN be heroes and heroines like that - the trouble is that fandom tends to take "she is the best at combat" as "Mary Sue." At the same time, a Mary Sue is adored by almost everyone (and if she isn't, they're Bad People), she has no flaws, and there isn't anything she's not good at. Same with Gary Stus.

Re: ALL heroines are "Sues"

[meishuu]

Oh, I agree. Heroes that are Stus and Sues do exist, but I think fandom is too quickly to use the term, specially when it comes to female characters.