Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-08-28 07:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2795 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2795 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Law & Order: Criminal Intent]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Jeeves and Wooster]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Yahtzee/Zero Punctuation]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Markiplier]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Jackie Chan Adventures]
__________________________________________________
08.

[The Parent Trap]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Alexander]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Starsky and Hutch]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 08:35 am (UTC)(link)It... isn't? I mean, you aren't obligated to read anything carefully if you don't want to. (Though obviously that's going to significantly impact your understanding of whatever it is you're reading.) But if you're asking why it's not stated directly in plain language, i.e. "Shadow is a man of mixed race", then... I don't really understand. Stories often contain details that aren't explicit, that's part of the point in reading them and figuring out what's going on. You might as well ask why Gaiman doesn't come right out and say that Low-Key is the god Loki instead of letting people make that connection for themselves. Or why Gaiman waits to make that Mr. Wednesday = Odin connection. Or why Gaiman doesn't put in a footnote that says, "Mr. Nancy is actually Anansi, a West African trickster god who often takes the form of a spider." Why doesn't he simply tell us that Hinzelmann is the reason why the children of Lakeside are vanishing and that Hinzelmann too is a mythological figure instead of the kindly, helpful man he appears to be on the surface? Why not state upfront what all the mythological identities of all the characters are?
So we circle back to your question.. what does he accomplish by having the readers "read carefully & look for clues?" That's just how books and stories work: some details are plain, some aren't. The discovery and grasping the significance through your own efforts is part of the fun, surely.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-08-29 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)That's kind of the point of this discussion: people overlook what are actually very explicit descriptors in order to keep assuming that characters are white. All "reading carefully" means is "actually paying attention."
no subject
And -- people on this thread ARE actually discussing textual details in the book (the conversation with the guard, the 'sickle-cell' reference) and having different interpretations of what they mean. This is the opposite of "not paying attention."