[ SECRET POST #2795 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2795 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Law & Order: Criminal Intent]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Fred Astaire/Ginger Rogers]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Jeeves and Wooster]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Yahtzee/Zero Punctuation]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Markiplier]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Jackie Chan Adventures]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Parent Trap]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Alexander]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Starsky and Hutch]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 012 secrets from Secret Submission Post #399.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

"But why should it be a detail we have to read for carefully & look for clues?"

It... isn't? I mean, you aren't obligated to read anything carefully if you don't want to. (Though obviously that's going to significantly impact your understanding of whatever it is you're reading.) But if you're asking why it's not stated directly in plain language, i.e. "Shadow is a man of mixed race", then... I don't really understand. Stories often contain details that aren't explicit, that's part of the point in reading them and figuring out what's going on. You might as well ask why Gaiman doesn't come right out and say that Low-Key is the god Loki instead of letting people make that connection for themselves. Or why Gaiman waits to make that Mr. Wednesday = Odin connection. Or why Gaiman doesn't put in a footnote that says, "Mr. Nancy is actually Anansi, a West African trickster god who often takes the form of a spider." Why doesn't he simply tell us that Hinzelmann is the reason why the children of Lakeside are vanishing and that Hinzelmann too is a mythological figure instead of the kindly, helpful man he appears to be on the surface? Why not state upfront what all the mythological identities of all the characters are?

So we circle back to your question.. what does he accomplish by having the readers "read carefully & look for clues?" That's just how books and stories work: some details are plain, some aren't. The discovery and grasping the significance through your own efforts is part of the fun, surely.

[likeadeuce]

I think we just have different interpretations of the book, thanks for your input.