[ SECRET POST #2801 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2801 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #400.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

05. http://i.imgur.com/pE4pmfd.png

[chardmonster]

Don't worry. If you find the kind if "sj" stuff Joseph fucking Fink posts offensive your opinion is probably worthless.

[(Anonymous)]

Except it nowhere says that.

[chardmonster]

Read the first part of the secret. They're listing his very mild sj comments as something annoying. I should have phrased it differently but I stand by that opinion.

[(Anonymous)]

Want to explain? I don't even know who Joseph Fink is, but the aggression in your comment has made me curious.

[chardmonster]

He's one if the main Night Vale writers and his comments are pretty damn mild. So if you find them annoying, you are probably shitty.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm not trolling but I'm kind of wondering if you're okay because you seem kind of frustrated tonight.

[chardmonster]

...yeah, I really am. But I'm also okay. Thanks for asking.

[elaminator]

He seems like an okay guy to me and I don't get how he's a 'SJW', but...too bad?

[(Anonymous)]

They mean that he isn't a raging bigot and sometimes talks about social issues that might shocks of shocks effect him. He's not a 'SJW'. He's a dude that thinks people should treat each other decently.

[elaminator]

Oh, I meant too bad that OP doesn't like him. I've followed him for a long time and while I'm not constantly on twitter, I've never seen him post anything that I thought was rude, or an overreaction, or anything like that. He just seems conscious of the issues that are important to him.

Thank you!

[elephantinegrace]

The term "SJW" has looped around to where I give an internal cheer every time somebody uses it to describe somebody I look up to or myself.

Am I reading this secret wrong?

[(Anonymous)]

It says the poster doesn't like someone because of his personality (as displayed in his twitter feed, I assume) and not because of his social justice tweets. Nowhere does it say he's an SJW.

Re: Am I reading this secret wrong?

[(Anonymous)]

The way that I read it implies that the SJ tweets are annoying but the really annoying thing is his personality

like, it's definitely implying that OP finds the SJ tweets a problem, albeit one they'd put up with if it wasn't for his unspecified other personality issues

Re: Am I reading this secret wrong?

[(Anonymous)]

Try following David Krumholtz, that's a challenge too.

[(Anonymous)]

"not even his SJ tweets"

Don't worry, I'm sure he won't miss you.

[(Anonymous)]

I don't follow him on Twitter but I find his introduction to the NV episodes annoying as hell.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, same. I liked listening to Night Vale to relax or fall asleep to (for some weird ass dreams) every now and then but I can only do that with the earlier episodes. Jarring voice. Not good.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. I hate how now it's several minutes of announcements before every podcast. There are other places to get the information about upcoming shows and merch.