case: ([ Etna; Hee. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-12-11 01:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #340 ]


⌈ Secret Post #340 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________





Notes:

Posting for Shahni! And early because I've got pseuicide class.

Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 150 secrets from Secret Submission Post #049.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 2 3 4 ] broken links, [ 1 2] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Wednesday, December 12th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 18

[identity profile] ronsard.livejournal.com 2007-12-11 10:15 pm (UTC)(link)
You are not arguing for the implementation of an eugenics program in the present, but if I infer this correctly, one would have had to take place at some point in history in order for the "what if" to even come into play. The question, again, is where do we draw the line? At the very dawn of medicines? Perhaps that would have just wiped out the human race as a whole, just as nature "intended", and then we wouldn't even be here debating this. Or maybe later on, before the discovery of penicillin perhaps? When?

Historically, suggestions of an eugenics program have been in existence since ancient times -- a very famous one is discussed in Plato's Republic, involving refusal of medical treatment for the sick (sounds familiar) and in extreme cases, infanticide. I don't think humanity as a whole will ever reach the point where something like that is considered acceptable.

Slightly OT (well, not exactly), I have some training in geology myself and -- while the theory of solar expansion is pretty much legitimate, there's hope that by the time we come to that, we will already have developed the technology necessary to move Earth's population and colonize another terrestrial body. It would be unthinkable if the genius rocket scientist in charge of this program had died from an untreated case of osteosarcoma some years back ;)

Re: 18

[identity profile] ronsard.livejournal.com 2007-12-11 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
One final word: all this man vs. nature talk just reminds me that we, the human race, have done a lot to defy nature in the course of our existence and development, and what is more, we're rather good at it. I think what it comes down to is the question what ultimate goal should we seek, the end-all-be-all survival of our race, or the harmony between man and nature? And on that note, I don't think we should count man out of the fight just yet. There may yet be a way to go around natural laws that we haven't thought of.

(Anonymous) 2007-12-13 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
"...there's hope that by the time we come to that, we will already have developed the technology necessary to move Earth's population and colonize another terrestrial body. It would be unthinkable if the genius rocket scientist in charge of this program had died from an untreated case of osteosarcoma some years back ;)"

That's awful. Humanity is a waste of space, in my opinion- almost all we've done to the planet and ecosystems that have supported us and help us to grow is violate. This, in my mind, is paramount to murder of every living thing on Earth. Basically what you said just now was, "Aren't we humans great? We've managed to get on the path to ditching this shitty ball of mud for a nice new planet once we're done trashing it! =DD" So, no. I don't think that the genius rocket scientist in charge surviving was a good thing. We can claim that humanity will act in a more mature fashion on other planets and in the solar system, but that's bull. Humanity will always be humanity, as evidenced by central themes and human characteristics in literature from the B.C.'s to the A.D.'s, and humanity is extremely species-centric.

I agree with the OP of #18, too. Natural selection has proven itself to be blind and quite good at forming better and brighter species; in the case of humanity, it was a little too good. We're an extremely successful species, but because of this success, we're on the path to destroying everything.
(In an amusing turn of events, I'm going into medicine too- only it's veterinary medicine.)

[identity profile] ronsard.livejournal.com 2007-12-13 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Uh.

Nope, I don't think I'll waste a good argument on this. Sorry.

By the way, I hope you become a great vet, because all the other species on this planet will have to become some kind of super organisms in order to survive the Sun swallowing the Earth whole (as per my, uh, original point). You know, because all humans will obviously have destroyed themselves recklessly at that point. Why develop the technology? The human race clearly needs to die a painful death, while the rest of the planet dies right along with it.

(Most pointless, incendiary argument ever. Fucking tree-huggers, I'm voting Republican next year.)
Edited 2007-12-13 00:25 (UTC)