case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-08 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2806 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2806 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Five Nights at Freddy's]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Star Trek, MCU, Batman Begins]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Twilight Saga]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Xenosaga]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Great British Bake Off]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Law & Order: Criminal Intent]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Minecraft]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Macklemore]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #401.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Development is not a synonym for quality.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

I made no statements re: quality. Only pointing out the question asked was pointless because it could just as easily go the other way.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think that's true, because I think we tend to assume that character development is intrinsically a good thing.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
No, character development signals that "this is a protagonist that the story is about," and not everyone is a protagonist that the story is about, including these characters. "Love interests" tend to stay static.

The fact that none of these characters are a protagonist in their story is a separate topic.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
No, character development signals that "this is a protagonist that the story is about,"

I disagree. There are protagonists that have 0 development whatsoever.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
"Being an apple signals that this is a fruit."
"I disagree. There are fruits that aren't apples."
".....o...kay."

(Anonymous) 2014-09-08 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Example: Bella Swan.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-09 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
a therefore b =/= b therefore a

(Anonymous) 2014-09-09 12:57 am (UTC)(link)
Character development doesn't necessarily signal that, though. There are characters who are not protagonists and who are not the focus of the story that still develop.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-09 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think that love interests necessarily stay static... if I see a romance, I expect both characters to develop if I'm to consider it a good story.