fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2806 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2806 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Five Nights at Freddy's]

__________________________________________________

03.

[Star Trek, MCU, Batman Begins]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Twilight Saga]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Xenosaga]

__________________________________________________

06.

[Doctor Who]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Great British Bake Off]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Law & Order: Criminal Intent]

__________________________________________________

09.

[Minecraft]

__________________________________________________

10.

[Macklemore]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #401.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

The abortion thread OP asked for it to be closed, so case froze it.

The Israel thread got heated really late and nobody reported it, so I'm not sure if case caught it.

I'm wondering what the precedent is for freezing non-wanky threads upon request. That's not really fair for any of the participants. I think if you start a thread in GC, you should be willing to accept that it might become a site of conversation for people who are not OP.

I gotta say that I agree with you. I understand wanting to be accommodating to the people who come here and make sure that they're comfortable, but I don't like the idea that a conversation can be shut down just because the person who started the thread has lost interest.

It was reported, but it was done so late into the conversation, so it was able to get very heated, very quickly.

[ SECRET POST #2806 ]

Re: Can we bring IP logging back?

Re: Can we bring IP logging back?

Re: Can we bring IP logging back?

Re: Can we bring IP logging back?