Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-09-14 03:43 pm
[ SECRET POST #2812 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2812 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 10:21 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
But I'm also not a Whovian - maybe Moffat's writing on Who makes more sense than his other projects do?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 02:47 am (UTC)(link)Every single one of the new episodes has been illogical to the point of distraction. I'm also very timeline and logic-conscious, but even if you're not, this series episodes are just very bad. I have seen children's shows on CBBC with better plotlines.
The premises are horrible. Into the Dalek was particularly bad.
A rebel group captures a Dalek... and it's a bit of a weird one, but in order to 'repair' the Dalek, they have to be shrunk and put inside it. Through the eye stalk. For some horrible Fantastic In-Body Journey style rubbish.
Never mind that it's been established for LONGER THAN I HAVE BEEN ALIVE that you can reach the squirmy kaled inside the Dalek's armour by OPENING THE CASING. It's not as if this is a Classic Who thing, it's happened during the revival multiple times.
That the premise for that episode STARTS with something totally unnecessary and just pointlessly runs with it... ARGH.
So no, it does not make sense. And before anybody says it, it being a silly science fiction series does not excuse the lack of sense-making.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 04:59 am (UTC)(link)I am fine with silly science fiction (science is not my major anyway so you could probably get away with a lot with me) but I still think there needs to be rules as to how a certain world works. Moffat tends to rely way to heavily on thinking the audience either a. doesn't get it b. doesn't care or c. won't remember it. But then I've also read interviews where he openly admits he doesn't do his research.
I really think he's the type of writer who needs an editor to come in and tell him what works and what doesn't. Being a showrunner has not helped his writing skills at all.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 10:40 am (UTC)(link)'What if X is a Y? Ha! we had you going there, actually X is Z!'
'But what about when A, B and C happened? Aren't they things that would only happen if X was a Y?'
'No idea what you're talking about...oooh look over there!' *vanishes*
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-14 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 12:34 am (UTC)(link)ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 02:36 am (UTC)(link)My favourite episodes for 9 and 10 were all Moffat ones (barring The Girl in the Fireplace, which was unforgivably shit) and I have absolutely ZERO interest in the Doctor Who fandom, or fanfiction, or any of the SJW bullshit that follows Moffat around.
Thanks for just assuming that, because somebody doesn't appreciate your Almighty Overlord butchering one of their favourite shows over the span of a few series, it's got to be social justice or fandom related, though.
Moron.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2014-09-15 04:42 am (UTC)(link)