[ SECRET POST #2815 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2815 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[John Green]


__________________________________________________



04.
(Hemlock Grove)


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Russell Edwards' Naming Jack the Ripper]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Coronation Street]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

being a good fiction writer has nothing to do with being a good person.

[chardmonster]

John Green really always seemed like a really nice dude. His books are pretty samey and tend to have themes that are incredibly twee. I wish he'd stick to nonfiction.

Re: being a good fiction writer has nothing to do with being a good person.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, this. He seems like a nice enough person, but I have basically no interest in reading his works. Characters who die in a tragic yet meaningful fashion that helps enlighten all around them, which seems to be the main topic of several of his books, is not anything I want to read.

Re: being a good fiction writer has nothing to do with being a good person.

[(Anonymous)]

Two of his books, let's be honest. And those two books? While sharing that theme? Were very different.

Re: being a good fiction writer has nothing to do with being a good person.

[chardmonster]

Were they? I'm talking in terms if the reading experience, not accusing Green of literally self plagiarizing or something.

Re: being a good fiction writer has nothing to do with being a good person.

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, I mean. They were completely different stories. Just because they share a thematic element doesn't mean the reading experience is identical.

Re: being a good fiction writer has nothing to do with being a good person.

[(Anonymous)]

My thoughts exactly. He seems like a sweet guy, I just have no interest in his books.