case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-22 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2820 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2820 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
nayance: (Default)

[personal profile] nayance 2014-09-22 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
If I was given a choice between playing a game without much diversity, but that has good characters, a solid plot, and is overall enjoyable; and a game with a diverse cast, but with poorly developed characters and little to no plot or originality, I'd choose the first. This goes for any medium.

Obviously I'd like more diversity across the board because, y'know, all those minorities exist. But it's pretty obvious when the only selling point for a game/book/comic/whatever is diversity, and when that's what creators were banking on selling their shit for them, rather than any actual work.

I do believe that it's a fad. Either that, or the creators hearts were in the right place and they went about it in the complete wrong way.

Basically: It's not a bad thing to call crap as it is, even if it is decorated with glitter/diversity.