case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-22 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2820 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2820 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 045 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Don't be dense. The friend doesn't have to do anything, and it's her right to choose what to do. She doesn't have to invite a dialog, nobody said that.

But it would be something a good friend would do. Because if you're friends, you talk about things. If my friend suddenly encountered an obstacle in the way of plans we'd been looking forward to for months, I'd expect them to at least make an effort to go before giving up completely, because I'd do the same for them. Because trying to keep promises to each other is important to me in a friendship.

Even if the dialog ended up establishing that making an effort to raise the money would be too difficult even with help due to other commitments and all, at least that's something more than leaving your friend hanging all of a sudden.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
don't be dense. saying "you owe your friend an explanation and an opportunity to argue you out of your decision, or you're a bad friend" is saying she has to invite a dialog.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
Or what, I'm going to go over there and drag her into a room to talk it out? o_O

You're simplifying this and making this black and white when it isn't. Friends aren't split between good and bad, and being a good friend in one area doesn't mean you're good everywhere, and accordingly so for being a bad friend. Inviting a dialog is an action a good friend would take. Someone doing one thing a good friend would do, doesn't make them a good friend all the time, but that IS the thing a good friend would do. Also, not being a good friend doesn't mean you're a bad friend, just like not being a good person doesn't mean you're a bad person, or not being a good singer means you're a bad singer.

If you can't understand that, I think you're being purposely dense... or your worldview is very black and white.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
if you think the only way one can "have" to do something is if compelled to do it by physical force, maybe it's you who has a simplistic worldview

and i see that you didn't even say "it's what a good friend would do." you said "it's what a friend would do." so you've said it yourself: the person who doesn't give op the dialog you feel she's entitled to is not a real friend.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
No, that's ridiculous and not what I'm saying. Plus:

"But it would be something a good friend would do."

I did say good there? So I don't know what you're talking about in the last part.

"Real" friends can be good or bad or great or terrible or even neutral or decent, anon. Just like real people. Would I think donating money to the disadvantaged is something a good person would do? Yes, of course. Would I hold everyone to that standard and judge them if they don't? No, because that's ridiculous. But that doesn't change the fact that it's something a good person would do. It doesn't make a person a terrible one for not doing it.

I think opening making an effort to keep plans with friends made months in advance or at least opening a dialog about them instead of simply stating they can't go is something a good friend would do. Would I hold everyone to that standard and judge them if they don't? No, because that's ridiculous. But that doesn't change the fact that it's something a good friend would do. It doesn't make a person a terrible friend forever for not doing it.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
i stand corrected, you said "because friends talk about things." but that does rather imply that the person who doesn't want to discuss something like this is not much of a friend

and it certainly does sound like you would judge someone for not doing so. perhaps you wouldn't label them a terrible person without a redeeming feature, but you clearly think that not "opening up a dialog" about her decision is not the action of a true friend, so you sound every bit as judgy as the people who are calling the op selfish and bratty

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
Good friends and true friends aren't the same thing. For example, and purely just as an example, not as a definition, to be clear, a true friend doesn't have to be a good friend all the time, but will pull through for you when push comes to shove.

You're reading a whole lot into my words that aren't there, and seem hellbent on continuing to do so, and I don't know why. Should we discontinue? I don't think we're understanding each other.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
And you're engaging in a whole lot of hairsplitting, but we may as well discontinue. I don't think we have anything to say to one another.

Re: Here is some perspective, op!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-23 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
If my friend suddenly encountered a financial obstacle to doing something with me, I'd understand, because I'm an adult who understands what it means to be responsible.

OP is the one who is actually being the bad friend. OP is placing his or her need to be validated over the friend's needs and situation. Actual friends, and people with maturity, recognize that plans can and do change depending on individual circumstances, and don't view a change of plans through the lens of "oh gosh this person must not think I'm important, waaah!"

OP is a child who has not had to deal with actual responsibility. And, judging by this comment, so are you.