[ SECRET POST #2822 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2822 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Psycho-Pass]


__________________________________________________



03.
[LoadingReadyRun]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Ella Masar and Erin McLeod (NWSL)]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Hadaka Shitsuji]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Richard Armitage]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Arrow]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Stargate SG-1]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Outlander]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Rant Thread:

[(Anonymous)]

the logical rubric we use to think about abortion in regards to questions like these, as I understand that, is that even if your answers to those questions aren't carefully considered, or you change your mind, that shouldn't matter - you're still free to make a decision and control your own life and your own destiny. i agree that adult decision making has to take place on all levels. but sometimes it doesn't, and you still have to make a decision. and sometimes your mind changes unexpectedly. and you can't control that. it's an adult decision, yes, and everyone has to live with those consequences, but there is a decision available to men and it's to not be involved with the child.

i don't think anyone would say that any of the conversations you're describing here - their outcome or whether they take place at all - should impinge in any way on a woman's right to have an abortion, nor should they. so i don't understand why they should define a man's role and attitude towards a potential child. i don't understand why you would obligate a man to play a certain role in regards to an unborn child using the same logic that pro-life people use to restrict women and obligate them into a certain role, and use language about 'having to bear the consequences of having sex' that would fit perfectly well in with the rhetoric of a pro-choice person, and not see that as contradictory.

i do think, personally, all things being equal, the man should try to play a role in the child's life, but i don't see any reason to mandate that or even to demand it. i honestly, legitimately don't see any reason at all.

Re: Rant Thread:

[(Anonymous)]

but there is a decision available to men and it's to not be involved with the child

And that's what ends up happening. So I guess at the end of the day, my thought on the entire matter is, think more than 5 minutes ahead in time and everything will work out all right.