[ SECRET POST #2825 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2825 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #404.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[anonymous4]

If morally ambivalent characters are well-written, and I can see their point of view and understand why they do what they do, I can like them despite their behaviour -- I can sympathise with them.

If they're badly written, and there's no humanity in them, I don't waste my time reading about them. [I once tried to write a psychopath, which was stupid because I didn't understand him, but I think that a realistic story set inside a psychopath's head would actually be quite boring.]

I think I benefit from experiencing 'evil' second hand. Briefly feeling what would be like to hurt someone reinforces my conviction that hurting someone's a bad thing.