case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-27 03:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2825 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2825 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #404.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-28 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, but that basically leads to the death of discourse. It basically comes down to a circle jerk where everyone squees over how wonderful everything is. Which people have the right to do. But tags are meant to designate when you're talking ABOUT something right? Not just if you're saying only good things. I'm all for having pro and anti tags, but I think a general tag should be neutral and include everything -- hate, gushing, criticism, analysis, meta, everything.

What's the point otherwise?

It's easy enough to create a "pro" tag if you ONLY want good things. Otherwise the fandom just ends up fracturing.