[ SECRET POST #2828 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2828 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Wakfu]


__________________________________________________



03.
[rupaul's drag race]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Law and Order: Criminal Intent]


__________________________________________________



05.
[3-2-1 Contact: The Time Team]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Anna Popplewell, Reign]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Strain]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Justice League]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Louisa May Alcott's Little Women]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #404.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

...no. They gave good reasons why he is likely white, not unavoidably so.

Moreover, do y'all really think those Roman soldiers who settled in Britain didn't consist of the people of the territories Roman had conquered?

[(Anonymous)]

Two thousand to 1600 years ago. I doubt the bloodlines have been preserved such that a visibly black person in Britain owes anything to the Romans.

Reaching. Also desperate to show off a tidbit of knowledge, which we already knew thanks.

[(Anonymous)]

I agree. A much better idea would be to have James's parents (or just mother) to be more recent arrivals, or descendants of male Potters who went overseas with the British Empire. There's certainly students of Afro-Caribbean and South Asian origin at Hogwarts, so there's definite Imperial demographic influence there. I wonder what the interaction between British wizards and wizards of colonised countries were/are?

[meadowphoenix]

Lol, not really boo. But you're so desperate to say I'm "reaching" that you've lost the thread of the argument.

Let me help you. The notion that the Romans were the only settlers in Britain, afterward the "purity" of the people was preserved is hilarious. If Nordic countries have a noted Islamic presence, before and after the Romans, the likelihood of Britain being stalwart against outside influences is an untenable position. However, the presence of the Romans notes how long ago we have a record of such a settlement (which says nothing about unrecorded settlements). Also, you seem to be assuming that genetic presence a) doesn't hide, or b) there wasn't any non-white presence that could have married into the peverell clan (despite the fact that it is highly likely based on nomenclature that there was a peverell daughter who married someone else to get to the last name Potter, an occupational last name where occupations were open disproportionately on the non-white people brought/coming into England). I.e. it's perfectly possible a pureblood family could be desi, or black, or asian, it's just not likely what JKR meant.

But saying someone is "unavoidably" white defies the laws of statistics, as well as history.

I didn't think I would have to explain, but most people don't understand probability so.

[(Anonymous)]

He's white. Simply wishing for him to be otherwise doesn't change that fact. Sorry, snookums.

[meadowphoenix]

oh, you're not going to address anything? k.

[(Anonymous)]

Sigh, they are white, just... get over it.

[meadowphoenix]

or what?

[(Anonymous)]

how could nordic countries have an islamic presence before the Romans, when Islam didn't exist when Romans were a thing?

I don't even get your argument. you're saying it's "perfectly possible" because people travel or what?

or is this like a 'medievalpoc' thing?

[meadowphoenix]

What I'm saying is that if physicists know that throwing something at the wall doesn't guarantee anything other than the likelihood that that thing will hit the wall, then saying a race is unavoidable is obviously bullshit. There's no such thing as certainty; y'all idiots need to stop applying non-existent certainty to race.

[(Anonymous)]

I think you ought to stop playing historian, when you're clearly not studied in history. Of course anything is "remotely" possible, that doesn't mean it's likely enough to entertain as a theory until we actually have some evidence in this discussion.

and the name-calling, c'mon.

[meadowphoenix]

I do indeed find it idiotic that people are so married to a theory that is mostly based on bias yes. Not sorry.

As for playing historian, i have the evidence i need to suggest such a thing is possible rather than "unavoidable". (Moreover, in universe, what are y'all going to do about Blaise Zabini?) I don't need a thesis to suggest that unavoidability of race of all things is a suspicious thing to say.

[(Anonymous)]

so you admit you have no idea what you're talking about.

and yet you're the one calling people idiots, haha.

[(Anonymous)]

do you have facts or just conjecture?