case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-10-07 06:46 pm

[ SECRET POST #2835 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2835 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #405.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2014-10-08 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
I'll grant you this much, there may be different ways of being high-IQ. I got a 193 on the Stanford-Binet, which I was told implies at least 160-something on the Wechsler. For me, what that means is that I am really, really good at anything that I can frame in terms of formal logic and if-then statements. On the other hand, I don't have any aptitude for games like chess, I do terribly at anything that involves lateral thinking, I tend to need a walkthrough to beat adventure games . . . I think there's a very narrow skillset that IQ test creators designated as "intelligence," and my having that skillset may not make me the same as an actual genius.
making_excuses: (Default)

[personal profile] making_excuses 2014-10-08 07:15 am (UTC)(link)
You must have taken an older test than me it seems, or not necessarily, I was curious about the different tests, as I never bothered to figure out which one I took as a kid. So been learning more than I will ever need to know about the different IQ tests there anyway the Norwegian Children's Psychiatric Service uses the Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children, so I would assume that is the one I was tested with, and my 156 score is according to my shiny graph thingy I found comparatively lower than yours, but in the same bracket Or the thing stops at 145+ for the Stanford - Binet one as the scoring system has changed and the higher scores are only on the older test, actually my score is also after an older test, but it was still in the graph I found.

Anyway I am good at problem solving and have a great memory, but there are huge gaps in my knowledge and skillsets, and I might be highly intelligent, but I don't do anything with the potential. Only way I use my it is when I remember the plot to the 10 - 20 books I am currently reading (as in been reading some of them for a couple of years now, I just put them back in the shelf and forget about them) and remembering television plots, oh and if you ever hang out with me I will mostly always be able to tell you where you put something if I was in the room while you put it down. I study something that is so easy that anyone could do it, honestly my BA is the easiest thing on earth, you just need to use logic and you are golden.

Anyway what I should get better at is not having two discussions at once when people don't realize it, because if you don't know me you will not be able to follow me.