case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-10-09 06:18 pm

[ SECRET POST #2837 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2837 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06. [ns]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 014 secrets from Secret Submission Post #405.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)
What's been said is that you, OP, do not understand a character and do not understand said character's resolution. That is a fact. The rest is easily deduceable from your overreaction which you are now going to deny, of course. Don't be mad a character is good even though you don't like it.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 02:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Not OP. Anon is arguing with something not even in the secret. Anon is a dipshit. Thanks for playing.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 02:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi OP, we can read between your lines.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 02:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Not OP, so no you can't.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
mte. OP, or this one anon with OP's opinion, or whatever - hate the book if you like, hate the sleazy rapist author by all means, whatever. But if you're going to criticize the actual story, at least understand it instead of pulling things out of your ass. you're free to disagree as you like but frankly it sounds like you've forgotten a lot of what the characters were about, or maybe never finished actually reading the book.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 03:12 pm (UTC)(link)
You're pulling arguments out of thin air that nobody ever made, and you're telling other people to "understand it" and "stop p[ulling things out of your as?"

No wonder you love this book so much.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 03:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, your ONLY argument has been "Morgaine is so perfect".

That's it.

No bringing up anything from the book, no actual discussion of Morgaine's personality, and certainly you don't seem to remember anything about the other characters, male and female alike.

Like, you haven't even read the book, have you. Did you watch the TV adaptation while you were massively drunk one night and that's it, or..?

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Read the book several times. It seems your only argument is "stop saying bad things about stuff I like"

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)
lol well, you're certainly consistent with the whole "embarrassingly shallow understanding of text" thing.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
And you're consistent with "you disagree with me so you're wrong."

Good lord, no wonder you love this piece of shit book.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Not the anon any of you are referring to, but if this is trolling, it's inanely repetitive. If these arguments are actual examples of your critical thinking in action, I'm embarrassed for you.

I won't be checking back, but don't worry, you can have the last word if you want - it seems to be important to you.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
lol

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 09:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Whoah. You read a book you hate several times. Why. So you can argue poorly with fans of said book?

(Anonymous) 2014-10-10 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
lol