case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-10-24 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2852 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2852 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Harold and Maude]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________
















05. [ SPOILERS for Blood of Olympus ]



__________________________________________________



06. [ SPOILERS for The Walking Dead ]
[ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



07. [ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



08. [ WARNING for suicide ]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #407.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dethtoll: (Default)

Re: on gamergate

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-10-24 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm ashamed to admit I bought into the "journalistic integrity" lie for a little while. I'd been banging on the "games journalism is a bunch of shills" drum for years and years, ever since a guy was fired when a publisher pulled their ads after he wrote a bad review of a game. So I was easily suckered in. But I realized that not only is it ultimately irrelevant (entertainment journalism of any type is inherently a shill anyway and there's nothing to really be done about it) but in this case it's just a front for a misogynist ultra-tirade by outraged neckbeards, and I don't care how bad some people want to try to label me as one, I am not one of those... things. I'm done with it. I bailed quickly once I saw how ugly things were getting and how much the term has stopped meaning anything to do with journalistic integrity. I know some people are trying to reclaim the hashtag to talk about the topic GG is ostensibly actually about, but I think it's pointless. Let the trogs have it.
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: on gamergate

[personal profile] chardmonster 2014-10-25 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
Oh I agree about games journalism, and about how GG could have looked legit at first. Especially if you aren't willing to watch shitty hour long videos from some smarmy dude named Internet Aristocrat.

And then you also have people saying it's okay /v/ doesn't hate women look they created Vivian and are supporting that woman game initiative for propaganda reasons *cough people did that here you know who you are cough*

It's the people who are still supporting bullshit I'm on about.

The one good thing about this is that 4chan seems better now that the worst of the assholes went off to their corner.
Edited 2014-10-25 00:04 (UTC)

Re: on gamergate

(Anonymous) 2014-10-25 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
P sure there are people on here who are just unambiguously pro-Gamergate

We'll see though!
chardmonster: (Default)

Re: on gamergate

[personal profile] chardmonster 2014-10-25 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
I'm pretty sure the person who posted about how awesome Vivian was is unambiguously pro-Gamergate and knows saying that wouldn't go over well here.
Edited 2014-10-25 00:11 (UTC)