[ SECRET POST #2852 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2852 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Harold and Maude]


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________
















05. [ SPOILERS for Blood of Olympus ]



__________________________________________________



06. [ SPOILERS for The Walking Dead ]
[ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



07. [ WARNING for rape ]



__________________________________________________



08. [ WARNING for suicide ]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #407.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Negativity thread

[(Anonymous)]

I wonder if there's a way to subtly suggest that the organization who does this handles it differently? The intentions sound great, but if the persons don't have their carers and need help, that also seems to take away from their own opportunity to do something themselves, which I'll assume is partly the idea here.

Having said that, it's possible this person won't be as needy - not everyone with special needs is severely disabled and/or needs a carer.