[ SECRET POST #2859 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2859 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________






















13. [ WARNING for child sexual abuse ]
http://i.imgur.com/gniXUCl.jpg
[linked for anime image of a man and a kid]


__________________________________________________



14. [ WARNING for sexual abuse ]



__________________________________________________



15. [ WARNING for suicide ]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #408.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: AYRT

[iggy]

At one point did I deny that the Marauders were bullying Snape? Yes it was bullying. No that one situation does not constitute some people's insistence that Gryffindor is a 'house of bullies'.

I don't see what's wrong with me not feeling sympathy toward Snape. He was bullied, yes. That's not okay. I still don't feel sympathy toward his character, no.

Re: AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

At what point in your conversation with me did I say that Gryffindor was a house of bullies? The contention of this secret, to which my comment was a response and to which you have been responding to me, was:

"When people complain about Gryffindor bullies, I immediately assume they were assholes as children."

I responded with a comment highlighting an incident in canon where a Gryffindor was a bully, and my response to that incident, and why I believed that was a reasonable response given my own experiences. You responded to that by asking why I focused on that incident instead of other ones with innocent victims, despite the fact that most of those incidents do not have a Gryffindor as the aggressor, and despite the fact that I explained why that incident stuck out for me in light of both the context of the discussion and in light of my own experiences.

I don't give a damn what you feel towards Snape. I am angry because, in the context of the secret and the thread in which we are having this discussion, you have done nothing but dismiss the incident of Gryffindor bullying I was responding to, and thus my response to it and my right to make that response in light of the accusation in the secret, on the grounds that you do not like the personality of the victim in that particular incident.

If that was not your intent, and if we have been arguing at cross-purposes based on different understandings of the context of this discussion, then I apologise for my vehemence. In the context of a thread calling me an asshole for reacting to an act of bullying that strongly echoed one I had suffered when I was younger, I responded with anger to your percieved dismissal of that act and the legitimacy of my response to it.