case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-09 04:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #2868 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2868 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 075 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
The author has control to a point, but for how long? Eventually they will have to pander to paying customers, because these people will be paying for a product and have certain expectations. That's why I don't see this writers model for sales working out. IE What's to stop people paying for different chapters and wanting to change stuff drastically and first person paying gets pissed? Or writer panders more to one person paying then another, and there's a shitstorm this way? It'd maybe be one thing to sell fanfics on request, but preexisting ones that each person who pays will have a say in? I see there being a clash (either them overly give in and people will hate the works, or they will balk and refuse to make changes the people paying want so they lose people that way) and them losing readership.

I guess my dislike for this method is it's one thing to want reviews or attention, you'll get that with almost any fanworks. But it's super questionable when you take your readership hostage in a sense and demand payment for preexisting works works. If you demand reviews and attention and don't get it, there's liable to be some fans temporarily pissy but they'll forget about it. You demand money and don't produce good results it's going to be messy.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
"Eventually they will have to pander to paying customers, because these people will be paying for a product and have certain expectations." That whole line of reason on how it would lead to failure depends on how the commission is done. I would hope anyone offering commissions would think through how to offer them.

"you take your readership hostage in a sense" How is this hostage? Explain to me how an author can take their own writing hostage by not sharing it.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:07 am (UTC)(link)
It's not there own writing though really. It's fan fiction and by all means someone elses work. I don't care how AU it is, it's still someone else characterization and to a point world they are using. So no matter how you want to fight it, it's not really their work to start with.

Fan fiction is not something to make profit on.

It'd be like someone on tumblr becoming popular and then refusing to make any gifs until they got paid. They aren't the actors, or the show, or the animators. It's a fan work meant for enjoyment.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:13 am (UTC)(link)
Go look at the cookies metaphor below.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:32 am (UTC)(link)
The problem with your cookie metephor is that the cookie is just fucking cookie and does not equate to what we are speaking of. We are speaking about taking someone elses work as your own and getting paid for it. It really doesn't matter who wants the cookie/fanfiction at all. If someones selling it it's shady as fuck, period.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:50 am (UTC)(link)
Do you feel that way about fanart?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:53 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty much. I only bought it a few times when I was much younger, but regret it now.

But I feel like it gets more of a free pass because creators of works generally find it ok, compared to fanfiction. I also feel like with FF you're limited to how original you can make it, and it's very different with fanart.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:10 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT

But that's just it, it's not that they're not sharing, they're conditionally sharing based on whether people pay them for it or not. They're perfectly willing to share if their conditions are met.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I think you've gotta stop thinking of this in terms of commissions and fanfiction and look at it from a business perspective.

Giving someone part of a product for one price, and then saying that she can't get the rest of the product unless she pays more (despite the original agreement involving only the initial price), is not good business practice. In the real world, with a real product, not only would customers be pissed, but that business could face legal trouble.

Someone starting a fanwork for one price (in this case, for free), and then changing the pricing after the fact, is more analogous to that than to cookies.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 07:50 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I'll admit that I've never seen anyone offering fic commissions get many takers in the first place, but they've always offered standalone works that are written for that specific commissioner. So while the writer can, if that's the agreement, post the work elsewhere etc. all the story elements are tailored to that one person.

I agree that there's no way that writing individual chapters of the same fic for different people is heading for a massive clusterfuck. Delivering an unsatisfactory paid product has a whole different set of issues to delivering unsatisfactory free content. And if the author already has a plot in place, then how much of their own requests can feasibly be incorporated anyway?

Still feels less like a well-thought out plan and more "Hey, someone said they'd pay for this fic, I can make a few bucks here!"

(Anonymous) 2014-11-10 08:12 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah I agree. I feel like someone told the writer "You should get paid, because you're writing and writing is hard work and writers get paid" but the legalities behind this being someone elses works didn't cross their mind or they don't give two fucks about it.

It probably would have been better for them to make up a weak excuse and said they can't do anymore writing until they raise money for x reason and crowd funded rather then go this route. Probably would have got more money too that way.