case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-16 03:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2875 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2875 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-16 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
So you clearly don't see 'only the original author's vision is worth caring about' as judgmental of everyone who thinks/does differently.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-16 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I see the "in my mind, only the original author's vision is worth caring about" and see it to mean "Personally I only am interested in the original author".

I think assuming that that explicitly means judging everyone who thinks or does it differently and that's the ONLY right interpretation comes off as someone who's looking to be offended.

I see OP as someone who just doesn't feel like getting too deep into fandom and all the fandom ships and theories. They could be confessing it for any number of reasons , maybe all their friends are in fandom, or maybe they feel weird about being only interested in doing it this way. Sure, wanting to send a message of judgement to everyone in the comm could be a reason... but if someone were doing that they probably would word it differently.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-17 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
You can't look to be offended. You either are or you're not. I am, you're not, that's all there is to it.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-17 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
For someone critical of other people assuming things, you're doing an awful lot of it yourself.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-17 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, that's what I got from that statement too.