case: ([ Gin; Tragedy. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-12-23 05:56 pm

[ SECRET POST #352 ]


⌈ Secret Post #352 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.


__________________________________________________



2.


__________________________________________________



3.


__________________________________________________



4.


__________________________________________________



5.


__________________________________________________



6.


__________________________________________________



7.


__________________________________________________



8.


__________________________________________________



9.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________



21.


__________________________________________________



22.


__________________________________________________



23.


__________________________________________________



24.


__________________________________________________



25.


__________________________________________________



26.


__________________________________________________



27.


__________________________________________________



28.


__________________________________________________



29.


__________________________________________________



30.


__________________________________________________



31.


__________________________________________________



32.


__________________________________________________



33.


__________________________________________________



34.


__________________________________________________



35.


__________________________________________________



36.


__________________________________________________



37.


__________________________________________________



38.


__________________________________________________



39.


__________________________________________________



40.


__________________________________________________



41.


__________________________________________________



42.


__________________________________________________



43.


__________________________________________________



44.


__________________________________________________



45.


__________________________________________________



46.


__________________________________________________





Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 10 pages, 250 secrets from Secret Submission Post #051.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, 0 not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 2 3 ] too big, [ 1 ] hate letter.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Monday, December 24th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 06:49 am (UTC)(link)
the collar was done that way intentionally





and even if the dip in the nose is in actuality there, I'd take it out for the sake of the picture.






... not that i took you seriously before, but now?

ahaha.

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:00 am (UTC)(link)
Dude, uh....have you never been told by an art teacher to change something from the photo for the sake of a picture? Up the contrast, deepen the shadow, change the local color of something, etc?

If you haven't, that'd explain a lot of your art weaknesses. Art isn't always about just replicating exactly whats in front of you. You have to make changes to work things into a 2d picture plane, to make the piece flow well and create balance and harmony. This is all shit you should have covered in basic 2-d design, art 1 type classes. Shit, it's stuff you should have covered in an advanced high school art class.

The darkness right there ruins the way your eye travels through the piece and breaks up the flow of things, especially in his face. It breaks up the nice play of shadows you have going on, and the contrasts.

But uh, please, go ahead and make replica's, keep chruning them out. Lessen any future competition.

And you may have done it that way intentionally. Doesn't stop it from looking bad. If everything in your painting is done in a realistic style, and suddenly you throw up something in decorative style, it disrupts the flow of the piece. And that kinda of disruption doesn't look good there, as it's a VERY realistic style piece.

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
you are repeating things your teachers say without actually understanding them at all.

please keep doing it, it's fucking hilarious.

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:13 am (UTC)(link)
Bwa ha. How funny.

If that's what you think, at least I was paying enough attention to parrot it back, where as you, apparently, were sleeping in class. Or seem unable to apply them in any real situation where the most interesting aspect of your piece isn't already given to you by someone who came along before.

Your mad skills of copying a movie promotional piece really do over whelm.

Re: 32

(Anonymous) 2007-12-24 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
KEEP GOING GUYS THIS IS GREAT A+++ MADE MY DARK BRITISH MORNING SUNNY

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:34 am (UTC)(link)
Alas, if it was morning here you might have many hours, but I'm, at least, out of here for the time being....

Re: 32

(Anonymous) 2007-12-24 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
baww ;_; bb come back later ok??

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:42 am (UTC)(link)
I'll try my hardest, I PROMISE~

Re: 32

(Anonymous) 2007-12-24 07:43 am (UTC)(link)
<3

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
inorite! i didn't change a goddamn thing from this picture (http://drworm.net/ratpr0n/willard11.jpg)!

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:21 am (UTC)(link)
god, you are such a hack >:( andy warhol shames you

oh wait...

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
OH EM GEE YOU TOOK OUT THE RAT AND MADE IT RED.

I'm am wowed! WOWED AND AMAZED I TELL YOU.

You make me lol that you compare yourself to Warhol. Copying a picture=/=bein Warhol.

Oh, and the issue with your eyes is you have FAR too much whites, and it's way to light if you compare the lighter tones in his face to the lighter tones in yours. Because of how deep set his eyes are, the whites almost become a medium tone.

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:44 am (UTC)(link)
AND MADE IT RED.

which is fairly difficult to do and do passably well

maybe i made the eye too white to make it POP

DIRTY POP

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 07:48 am (UTC)(link)
...why in the world would change that be difficult? Monocromatic is one of the easiest color schemes, probably easier then natural color.

And by probably, I mean greatly.

It's why most the times when they're teaching you value you work in monochromatic.

Well, that it did.

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 08:00 am (UTC)(link)
it is the simplest color scheme, besides greyscale, however that doesn't mean that it's easier. unlike merely reproducing the natural colors, you have to put thought into choosing not only value but the level of saturation. so you're translating complex natural colors into something more basic, colorwise.

there's actually almost no white at all in that painting; the highlights are mostly fully saturated red.

Re: 32

[identity profile] penguinfaery.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 05:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok, I still fail to see the hardcore difficulty in that.

Natural skin tones are much more difficult to reproduce because the human eye is so use to them, it knows pretty instantly if their off. Like you said, you're making it more basic. And something like a triadic would be much harder to make look pleasing, then a simple monochromatic scheme.

Don't get me wrong, I LOVE monochromatic schemes, but they're also very forgiving and easy to work with.

Re: 32

[identity profile] kyriesanctus.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 08:15 am (UTC)(link)
Dude. I have to say.

As a person I am obviously not all too fond of you. XD

But that picture, on your DA, where you turned it red?

Amazing.

I've always admired people would could take a picture and do it in a different shade, or even color it as it was using the computer or paint or whatever. I try my damnedest and it never comes out quite right, so, I totally salute you, because your finished product is awesome.

Re: 32

[identity profile] kyriesanctus.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 08:16 am (UTC)(link)
.. "Would could"?

I mean "who could." Sorry.

Excuse the 3am typing errors.

Re: 32

[identity profile] drworm.livejournal.com 2007-12-24 08:41 am (UTC)(link)
Aw, why thank you. And I do mean that sincerely, because it really is nice to hear and it means a lot.

I like doing monochromatic stuff when I can, but it can be pretty difficult... admittedly it's easier with a photograph and doing it on the computer than trying to work from a live model with paints or whatever, but yeah.

I have a real love/hate relationship with realism, though; there are some people who can reproduce what they see with just amazing accuracy, and I've just never been one of them. I just practiced a lot.

But yeah, seriously, it's really nice to hear that you liked it. :)