case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-18 07:40 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2877 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2877 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2014-11-19 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
You do know he never actually said that...right.
Do you always 100% believe everything you read?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-19 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
Do you have a link for it being debunked? Just out of interest.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-19 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
http://www.fandomphd.com/

Scroll down a bit.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-19 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
A random person on tumblr said it wasn't true? Well, I'm convinced, that's an impeachable source right there.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-19 10:45 am (UTC)(link)
A random anon on F!S says he did it? Well, I'm convinced, that's an impeachable source right there.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-19 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt

I'm sure you think this was clever, but the point is if you're going to dismiss gossip from an unreliable source as being rubbish, then your rebuttal should be more credible, not equally incredible or less credible. Otherwise you look equally ridiculous.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-20 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
I don't think you understand how these things work: If you accuse someone of doing something shitty and your only source is bad and out of context gossip, you are the one who carries the burden of proof, not the person making a rebuttal.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only