[ SECRET POST #2884 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2884 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #412.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

Surrendered for jaywalking? Which, again, is why he was stopped? Is that a thing in Missouri?

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah, that's what they're known for. That, BBQ, and not knowing the difference between acknowledging that gay people exist and endorsing sheep-fucking.

The tourism board mostly focuses on the barbecue.

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

Or just, you know, gotten the fuck out of the middle of the damn street instead of lunging into a cop car and trying to take a gun away from a police officer. That would have worked.

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

So, were you actually there or do you just like to speculate/make excuses for people who shoot jaywalkers?

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

DA. Do you seriously think that the cop in question decided to shoot a jaywalker? To shoot in the middle of the street in front of witnesses a person that had caused no trouble beyond jaywalking? Or maybe, just maybe, the guy wasn't actually just a jaywalker, but someone who attacked a policeman.

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

Do you seriously think that this would be the first time that someone has been killed for not being deferential enough to the police? When the DA never ever finds that excessive force was used in such cases? In a town where a man was once charged with "destruction of city property" for bleeding on the uniform of one of the officers who was beating him during an "arrest" that ended up being a case of mistaken identity? When none of the officers involved that incident was removed from the department? If so, I've got some swampland in Florida to sell you.

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

Of course there have been such cases in the past. But in this particular case, considering all available evidence, claiming that "a jaywalker" was shot on the middle of the street through no fault of his own is delusional.

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

You don't need to put jaywalker in quotes. Unless you are calling the Ferguson PD liars, they didn't know he'd swiped a box of cheap-ass cigarillos from the Kwik-E-Mart before they decided that they needed to clean up the streets by harassing some black kids taking a stand on jaywalking. And no one said that the kid didn't make some dumb choices. But on one side you have two armed, trained, law enforcement officials in a vehicle and in the other you have an unarmed 18-year-old. Excuse me if I hold the people who swore an oath to protect the public, of which the kid they killed was a member, to a higher standard than a jaywalking teenager.

I guess that some people are just so determined victim-blame and lick police boot that they'll excuse anything.

Re: Ferguson general

[(Anonymous)]

Were you actually there, or do you like to make excuses for people who violently assault other people in front of witnesses?